Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:11

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why are perceived or real slights interpreted as rejections and reality by pwBPD?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Injuries force USMNT to make roster changes as the Gold Cup nears - The Washington Post
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Forget drones, Amazon has new robots that could replace humans - TheStreet
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Resident Evil surprise return announced by PlayStation - GAMINGbible
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
As an inmate did you have to live alongside a bully for your whole sentence?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
IndiGo, Delta, Air France-KLM, Virgin Atlantic Announce Partnership - Airways Magazine
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Barbra Streisand on New Album, Not Being Paid Enough for Meet the Fockers - Variety